The Freshman Experience

Another excellent Edublogs.org blog

2020: The future of education

December 13th, 2007 by · 5 Comments · Future musings

The mind boggles over how much education will change over the next 13 years. If we look back thirteen years ago, computers were just coming into the mainstream. Schools often had a classroom with a bank of computers in it; teachers signed up to take their classes to the lab. Students primarily played games or did simple assignments on the computer. When I taught in a rather poor school district in 1997, we had a bank of very old Apple computers in my classroom. Students used the computers to type papers, but they primarily sat unused. The students printed their papers on a noisy, slow dot matrix printer. In an alternative school in which I subbed, there weren’t any computers for student use – and that was as recent as 1999.

As education continues to change, there will continue to be the “have and have-not” school districts. While some districts may have a laptop for each student, some schools will probably continue to have labs. This discrepancy could lead a greater divergence among graduates. For classrooms of the future to use all the available technology, money will need to be infused into school systems. Financing can be provided by businesses, state and federal governments, and/or taxpayers. A You Tube clip showed a school built in West Philadelphia in partnership with Microsoft. It cost millions and each student was given a laptop. Everything was different from what we see today- the building, the classrooms, the entrance to the school, and especially the way students learned.

While Microsoft’s vision was an interesting one, I don’t think most districts or public colleges will have that kind of infusion of funds. In Director of Technology for Arapahoe High School in Centennial, Colorado Karl Fisch’s vision for the future entitled 2020 Vision, education changed at an unrecognizable speed. In thirteen more years, educational methodology will end up somewhere in between. As the price of computers fall, they will become more readily accessible to all students. Technology will be woven seamlessly into classroom content, if there are in fact classrooms. At the college level, more students will continue taking online classes that fit easily into their schedule.

With the Web 2.0 technology, lessons can be more interesting and interactive. Rather than have a page of directions, a teacher could explain how to do a task through a video from YouTube. Students will be able to load some of the lessons onto their MP3 player or iPod and listen or watch lessons wherever they are. Students in art history, for example, will not miss out if they are not in class to view all the art pieces. Virtual tours can be designed with voice overs that will let the classroom come to the students.

Home schooling is another area that could change dramatically through the use of Web 2.0. Many who home school scramble to supplement instruction or find ways to teach subjects with which they are not as familiar. Through live video exchange or Vodcasts, those at home will be able to access a classroom for that class. Perhaps, the student won’t have to participate in the lesson as it takes place, but could use it later by downloading it onto the computer. With high school classes going online at grade levels 9-12, home schooled students can easily access these classes to supplement their learning. Teachers can also share curriculum through Web 2.0. Working on group projects could also be a more seamless activity. Schedules will cease to be as much of an issue; students could plan through the discussion feature 24/7 on what they want to do.

Class delivery will change; so will the format in which students do papers and homework. Rather than writing one paper for one teacher, students will be able to Blog and share their papers with everyone. It will be a much more interactive process. Students can then learn to write for different audiences almost from the beginning. Instead of writing to please one person, the teacher, students will learn about editing, sharing ideas, and getting feedback from many.

Already teachers have Blogs in which they keep parents apprised of what is happening in their classrooms. Students can also look on the Blog for assignments and classroom events. Through Blogs, teachers can more easily share ideas for teaching, new uses for technology, and pose questions. Rather than working in isolation, teachers will be able to share ideas with people all over the country and, in fact, the world. By having a del.ic.ious.com account or RSS, teachers can quickly browse what has been posted that day. Setting up alerts will send new information right to email accounts.

Students will be connected in new ways. They can access RSS tags to keep current with events, politicians’ views, as well as what their best friend is doing. But what is most exciting is the way students will be able to connect and learn about other countries. Through Skype, whole classrooms of students can talk for free. A webcam will let them see each other. Students can work on projects together while residing on different continents through Wikis. Friendship can develop and be extended through FaceBook and MySpace as social networks. It’s the same as pen pals from the “old days” except the correspondence will be more instantaneous and real. New school rules and precautions about social networks will need to be enacted and taught.

Rather than carrying notebooks, pens, and paper, students can use a laptop to organize information. On Google, students could plan papers, keep a calendar, and house research all in one stop. They could keep “to do” lists and coordinate their lives all in one place. For a busy community college student, that is especially important. Many of those planning features are available on cell phones, too. By using Web 2.0 features, students can keep track of where they should be and when.

Education through cell phones may increase. In other countries, such as Japan, education downloaded to cell phones is more widely accepted than in the United States. Cell phones are small and convenient and most people own them. Laptop computers are also becoming smaller and lighter which will make them easier to carry. In fact, students may be able to upload their textbooks onto the computer rather than buying them. Although online text books aren’t terribly popular right now, the future may hold many more online texts. Libraries as we know them may become a room of the past.
Most importantly, students will need to be able to evaluate information and its sources. With the proliferation of information, not all of it is valid or usable. Being informational literate includes more than being able to use a search engine and turn on a computer. Being an information literate person will necessitate recognizing when information is needed, locate, evaluate and use information effectively to succeed.

A revolution is happening before our eyes. Sociologist Alvin Toffler, in the ground breaking 1970 book Future Shock, theorized future shock is a personal perception of “too much change in too short a period of time”. He also coined the term “information overload” that refers to having “too much information to make a decision or remain informed about a topic.” If future shock was viable then, it is a stark reality now. While computers and especially Web 2.0 provide unprecedented power for varied kinds of data in mind-staggering speeds, it also produces change at the same rate.

I became more aware of Toffler’s writing than when watching Karl Fisch’s vision for the future of education entitled 2020 Vision. My head spun as I tried to keep up with the change that he envisioned happening at exponential rates. Fisch was describing a time period of only 13 years, yet education was almost unrecognizable. I find it especially difficult because I remember the days, not so long ago in the fifties, when painting a class mural was a big deal. For years, my educational experience wasn’t too different than my parents’ or my children’s. That is not true anymore. Education is changing and will continue to change. As educators, we will need to help our students and ourselves, prepare for and navigate these changes.

What I hope will never go away is the human touch of education. Teachers help change lives and influence young people. The methodology may change, school structures may look different. But, if you ask anyone after years have gone by, most people can name the teacher that influenced their lives the most. May that special teacher’s touch never go away from the classroom, no matter how much technology changes.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Mug66WnoSk from YouTube

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Future_Shock

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_overload

http://www.lps.k12.co.us/schools/arapahoe/warriorportal/2020vision.mov

New tools for college students

December 11th, 2007 by · 3 Comments · Lesson Ideas

I new tool I would suggest to students is Backpack located at http://backpackit.com/.

It is a free online tool that could help students organize themselves in one place. Community college students are incredibly busy; many of them hold 2 or 3 jobs to pay for college, a social life, and some have young children. In one place they could have to-do lists, a calendar, and organize photos. The feature I liked the best was the reminder that can be sent to a cell phone. It seems as if many students have cell phones and most have assess to computers. I would be a great way to organize information rather than having little slips of paper that easily get lost. I could easily integrate this tool, or one like it, into the lesson on time management.

The paperless classroom

December 6th, 2007 by · No Comments · Uncategorized

How would a paperless class change your role as a teacher?

If I had a paperless classroom, I would truly feel more like a facilitator than a teacher. Students could spend more time looking up answers and guiding their own learning.  I really like ANGEL or BlackBoard and try to post all the assignments on that vehicle and have the “collected” through the vehicle. I handle very little paper. The problem I have is this- for those students at home, not all have computers. Some are using computers that are very old and outdated. It is difficult to trade information with them.

How would paperless classes change learning?

As I said above, I think the paperless class room would allow students to guide their own learning and discern what references are better than others. Hopefully, they would learn to connect ideas and people together in a way we don’t now. I do not think that methodology would be appropriate for all students.

How would you measure learning in a paperless class?

I would set up rubrics like this class has modeled. Students would need to self assess and I would also have some group assessment if students worked in groups. It is too easy for students to let others do it.

Would a paperless space make it easier or harder to build a learning network? Why?

I think it would be easier to set up a learning network because it is easier to connect through the internet than ever before. It brings new issues of communication. As I have found through the wikis, just because you can connect, it doesn’t mean you are communicating. I still believe many of these technological tools are just that–tools. There is a place for working alone and thinking alone. Some of us even like it (Me being one). Groups and connectivity have their place, but I don’t believe they can be the over riding method in teaching. I’ve never known a method yet that appeals to all students. Even in the class I teach, I have lessons on ANGEL and lessons in class. Some students pass by doing all the lessons on line and some pass by coming to class. The combination makes it so students end up benefitting (I hope).

Will lecturing go away in the classroom?

December 5th, 2007 by · 2 Comments · Uncategorized

“Teaching is Conversation, Not Lecture”

How has this shift affected your teaching practice so far?

I have always taught a class that didn’t require lecture. First I taught home ec and then special education. Neither lent themselves to lecture, so I have always used a more “hands on” approach. I choose this because I don’t see lecturing going away completely at the college level. Somehow, a teacher must impart large bodies of information in physics, chemistry, or math. I wouldn’t want to have a more organic approach to those topics. I’d want to hear from an expert.

How do you expect it might affect you in the future?

This shift has already affected me. I’m integrating more discussion and technology into what I do already. I’m not big on lecture anyway. I will be making my first vodcast for my class.

Have your views changed since you started this course?

My views have changed because I really didn’t know anything about the technology that was out there. Sure, I’d watched some YouTubes and I’ve read about FaceBook. I know about Blogs and wikis, but never thought about integrating them into the class. Now my brain is bursting with different ways I could integrate some more technology. If I move into teaching a three credit class, I will have more opportunity to use these tools.

How can you use technology to facilitate this shift in your own classroom?

As I said, I got permission to do a vodcast for the class I teach. I used a blog this eight weeks and I’m going to try a wiki next eight weeks. I’ve introduced lessons with a podcast I downloaded from Google. I now know these tools are out there and can integrate them when the time is right. For instance, I can use Flikr in my daily work and wait for the right time to integrate it into my teaching.  I don’t believe we need to use everyone ever semester.

Part II on Skype

December 1st, 2007 by · No Comments · Uncategorized

Ah, technology! The assignment asks how I could use this at work. Here’s my problem-I can’t download this software at work. I tried, I really tried. There are two problems: first, we aren’t supposed to download software other than what our “build” came with. Mine didn’t come with Skype.  Second, I spend about 80 percent of my day on the computer doing research. I got what is called a deep freeze on my computer; it allows very little in. Skype isn’t one of the very littles. The deep freeze doesn’t allow for any pop-ups to get in. I was getting them all the time and my computer was getting corrupted. We have an ancient server at my college and everyone is praying it will last two more years. So, in a nutshell, no Skype for me. But I did enjoy reading others enthusiasm and uses for it. I could network with colleagues at other campuses, as suggested, if I could have it on my computer. I could still do that while at home, but I do little college work at home.

Caroline on Skype

November 29th, 2007 by · 3 Comments · Uncategorized

Ok, I’ll admit I’m tired. And I’m on information overload. I read the blog posting about the teacher who conferenced with a class in Peru. That’s cool. Once. Or twice. To learn about other cultures. It’s my practical bend again. I really think we need to teach students how to get a long with each other. Other students. In the flesh.

Think of people you know who are successful in work and life. Many of them have the ability to get along well with other people. People skills make such a difference between success and failure. So, I come down in thinking this is a tool in an arsenal, not the whole arsenal. I don’t have a use for this in my class because the class is so short and I don’t teach anything where this would be practical.  I’m glad I know about it!

PS They are doing a podcast of someone talking about assessment at MCC. Guess who gets to be the guinea pig teacher who is the first to try it? You’ve got it – me. Very cool. And, even better, I “get it.”

Connectivism: Do I agree?

November 29th, 2007 by · 3 Comments · Uncategorized

According to George Siemens regarding “Connectivism: A Learning Theory for a Digital Age” . . .
“We are moving from formal, rigid learning into an environment of informal, connection-based, network-creating learning. …Knowing is no longer a destination. Knowing is a process of walking in varying degrees of alignment with a dynamic environment.”
(Siemens, http://www.learningcircuts.org/2005/nov2005/seimens.htm) If you understand and agree with the above quote, then it’s obvious that connectivism holds merit as a learning theory.

I understand the above quote which was taken from http://bcefall0710pls.wikispaces.com/Pro+Connect on November 29, 2007. I agree with the above quote. That doesn’t mean I believe that connectivism holds merit as a learning theory. First of all, I’m not sure I understand the premise of connectivism theory. The quote above is one small part of the entire learning theory. It is like quoting a Bible verse without reading the whole passage. Taken out of context, it makes sense.

I work in the concrete and it is difficult for me to live in the world of theories. First of all, it is hard for me to really understand the premise under which he works. I understand the individual parts, but don’t necessarily get the whole. I find myself nodding with each point, “Yes, OK, I agree.” Then I reach the end and I’m like, “HUH?” The conclusion didn’t particularly follow the premise. Yes, we are moving in a faster world, but I believe we’ve connected with each other to some degree to learn for a long time. Remember group work? And haven’t we had to change our conclusion based on new information for a long time, also? Remember how the world’s population believed the world was flat?

We access information faster. I currently feel overwhelmed. I can’t deal with all this. Instead of connecting will we just throw our hands into the air and give up? Is ignorance bliss?

Being very practical, I like to see how we now need to teach and prepare people to go out in the world. I come down on the side of pedagogy. We need to continue to teach our students how to think. For me, whether it is a new learning theory or pedagogy, how will we use it? Isn’t that what matters?

Podcast for my classroom

November 23rd, 2007 by · No Comments · Uncategorized

http://www.apple.com/au/education/ipod/lessons/oralhistories.html

This is the podcast I chose to use in my classroom. The students have a lesson where they are to interview someone from a culture different than their own and write a short paper about it. I would use this as an alternative for those who are doing the class on line. I would ask them to contrast the interviewees life in Cuba compared to the United States. If you skip below the Wiki post, I plan on doing the interview listed in that lesson. It would suit my purposes well.

Wikis in the classroom

November 23rd, 2007 by · No Comments · Uncategorized

This week we covered using Wikis in the classroom. I have some ideas swimming around in my head as to how I might use a Wiki. Students need to write a follow-up of some seminars they attend. I’ve thought of having the students who attend certain seminars do a Wiki about them. The problem I foresee is this: I don’t see the students enough to really teach what I would like done. I will have to think of this some more. I am playing with the idea of teaching English next year, so there may be a place for Wikis in that class.

Working together on a wiki, on-line was an interesting process. Communication is key when building a wiki as a group. Although we didn’t have a leader, if we had a bigger and more ongoing wiki I think it would help. I had fun with the collaborative process in that I wrote some of the pages and others edited them. Editing is not always my strong point, so I appreciated the help. People bring different skills to the table. I definitely see the benefits of a wiki while planning or perhaps working in a group in a classroom. Caroline

Podcast in the Classroom

November 23rd, 2007 by · 1 Comment · Uncategorized

I have thought for a while that I would like to have a podcast of the president of the college welcoming the students to our College. He is not readily assessable, so I think a welcoming speech played the first week of the introductory class would be great.

I would have the president welcome the students to MCC. I would also have him tell them about his background. He also went to a community college and started his education there. I would have him relay why he went to a community college and what it meant to him in terms of his education. Lastly, I would ask him to tell the students why he chooses to continue to work at community colleges and what they mean to him. Then I would have him wish them all luck and close by saying he will see them at graduation. It could be the next best thing to having him come to class. He doesn’t have time to do that.